ccn pledge


Friday, 22 May 2015

Transpicuous News Weekend Report from Sunday May 17, 2015

Here is the Archive Video of Transpicuous News Weekend Report from Sunday May 17, 2015

News Links for May 17

Mandatory vaccination bill introduced in Congress


Brazil Cancels $2 Billion Contract with Israeli Security Firm for 2016 Olympics

Amtrak engineer says he can't remember deadly crash

Survivors 'unlikely' at site of U.S. copter crash in Nepal

BBking dies

Britain is too tolerant and should interfere more in people's lives, says David Cameron


SEPTA, Amtrak trains hit by projectiles minutes before fatal crash

The 1997 law that limits compensation to victims of railway accidents

Harper Government Retroactively Rewrites Gun Registry Law


US-Russia Round Three: Macedonia

The new rally with violence will be held on 17 May

Bulgaria sends army to Macedonia border

5 banks expected to plead guilty to felony charges

Canadian corporations hoarding record amounts in offshore tax havens

Switzerland is a banking capital. But a Bitcoin capital?

Why are People Celebrating? USA FREEDOM Act is a Big Win for the NSA- Not Civil Liberties


House passes Pentagon spending bill

Peru reopens investigation into mass sterilization program

Mass sterilisation scandal shocks Peru

​Ukraine and China ink $2.4 bn currency swap

bee die offs

Swarm of bees 'turned the sky black' in British town

Singer Sarah Brightman Calls Off Flight to Space Station, Ends Russia Training

Failed Russian Progress Spacecraft Falls to Earth and Burns Up

Microsoft: Humans have shorter attention span than a goldfish

The Obscure Trade Provision Everyone Is Talking About

Security expert allegedly told FBI he hacked & steered airliner mid-flight

​India & China seal record 24 deals estimated at $10bn

New Federal Vaccine Mandate Proposed: All Shots Required, No Parental Exemptions
- See more at:

TPP and TTIP “Free Market” “Trade” Deals Approved by US Senate: How America’s “News” Media Killed America’s Democracy:

US did not warn Syrian government of special forces raid against Islamic State

U.S. claims it killed top ISIS commander in Syria raid

War games: Russia reveals its latest tank is controlled by a PLAYSTATION controller
Read more:

In religious and political gesture, Pope confers sainthood on two Palestinians

Electronic skin makes your body a computer

Electronic skin makes your body a computer

Canada Threatens Scientists: SO SCREAM LOUDER!!!!

We are being told:  Every form of "Freedom of Speech" is being taken away from us.   More importantly, that freedom to speak clearly and to openly discuss concerns, ideas, theories, and truly relevant facts, is being ripped away from even those who are fully qualified in their fields.  This isn't just about Wyoming banning Science discussions that go against the rhetoric being pushed by local government agencies, this is about even the professionals being gagged.

This isn't new.  .... But is becoming more and more public as those who've been stifled are lashing out publicly in frustration.  It's time that the public get on board and demand the truth. To Demand the freedom to speak the truth and the freedom to uncover the truth, and the freedom to stand up for the truth.

When Highly respected people in highly respected fields start telling the world the facts- the REAL facts, then we need to get behind these people and support them and insure that their message is being heard across the planet.

"They" are lying to us.  "They" are hiding the truth.  ..... and "They" need to be stopped.  How?  By yelling louder than they do.   "They" are the few.  WE are the Many.  I can guarantee that our outrage is MUCH louder than their lies.


One voice may not make enough noise to be heard over the squawking liars, but ALL OF US are FAR FAR FAR Louder.   And THAT is what scares them the most.  THAT is WHY they are trying to shut/fetter/limit/censor the internet. Their main stream media whores are no longer capable of doing their jobs, because the people don't believe them any more.  .... So the people are turning to "Alternative Media" to find out what's going on in the world.   THAT completely TERRIFIES them.  Because when WE yell louder than CNN, the BBC and CBC.... they KNOW that they've lost.


love d

Most Federal Scientists Feel They Can’t Speak Out, Even If Public Health and Safety at Risk, Says New Survey

A major survey of federal government scientists commissioned by the Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada (PIPSC) has found that 90% feel they are not allowed to speak freely to the media about the work they do and that, faced with a departmental decision that could harm public health, safety or the environment, nearly as many (86%) would face censure or retaliation for doing so.

The survey, the findings of which are included in a new report titled The Big Chill, is the first extensive effort to gauge the scale and impact of “muzzling” and political interference among federal scientists since the Harper government introduced communications policies requiring them to seek approval before being interviewed by journalists. Information Commissioner Suzanne Legault is currently conducting her own investigation of the policies, which have been widely criticized for silencing scientists, suppressing information critical or contradictory of government policy, and delaying timely, vital information to the media and public.

In particular, the survey also found that nearly one-quarter (24%) of respondents had been directly asked to exclude or alter information for non-scientific reasons and that over one-third (37%) had been prevented in the past five years from responding to questions from the public and media.

In addition, the survey found that nearly three out of every four federal scientists (74%) believe the sharing of scientific findings has become too restricted in the past five years and that nearly the same number (71%) believe political interference has compromised Canada’s ability to develop policy, law and programs based on scientific evidence. According to the survey, nearly half (48%) are aware of actual cases in which their department or agency suppressed information, leading to incomplete, inaccurate, or misleading impressions by the public, industry and/or other government officials.

“Federal scientists are facing a climate of fear,” says PIPSC president Gary Corbett, “a chill brought on by government policies that serve no one’s interests, least of all those of the Canadian public. The safety of our food, air, water, of hundreds of consumer and industrial products, and our environment depends on the ability of federal scientists to provide complete, unbiased, timely and accurate information to Canadians. Current policies must change to ensure these objectives are met.”

“Documenting the problem is the essential first step toward solving it,” added Francesca Grifo, Senior Scientist with the Union of Concerned Scientists in the United States where, under the Bush administration, federal scientists faced many similar problems. “You can’t hope to solve the issues until you fully understand them.”

Invitations to participate in the online survey, hosted by Environics Research, were sent to 15,398 PIPSC members – scientists, researchers and engineers – engaged in scientific work in over 40 federal departments and agencies. Of these, 4,069 (26%) responded between June 5 and 19, 2013. The survey is considered accurate + or – 1.6%, 19 times out of 20.

  • Full report
  • Report in brief
  • Environics Research Report
  • Take action

  • Wednesday, 20 May 2015

    Over 90,000 people in Macedonian "Anti-Maiden" demonstration

    Breaking: [video] in Macedonia Over 90,000 "Anti-Majdan" Against Sunday's Western Backed 'Demos'

    May 18th, 2015, 

    - With some Photos from, report by Joaquin Flores for Fort Russ -

    * updated 9pm, EST

    "Tonight, VMRO-DPMNE and its coalition partners are holding a rally under the slogan "Macedonia Strong!".  Initial assessments count over 90,000 citizens, making this rally the largest in the history of Macedonia.  The number is expected to exceed more than 100,000 supporters. " -

    All photos below from today's 'Anti-Majdan' counter-demo in Skopje. 
    Video courtesy of RT:

    These Skopje based demonstrations were held as previously announced, to show that the present government, despite its problems, has more support than those protesting against the government. 

    However we should note something extraordinarily important about yesterday's protests as well. As confirmed by our own assets on the ground, as well as a working knowledge of the Color/Spring template, people came out to the protest yesterday for many different reasons, relating to several ongoing issues that are being covered in local media in Macedonia.  Some relate to legitimate issues, and others relate to manufactured problems conjured by pro-western media and western funded NGO's operating inside of Macedonia. 

    There is not sufficient evidence to promote the view that even most of yesterday's protesters came out to call for 'The PM' resignation'.  This demand was communicated carefully by the western backed event organizers to western media outlets.  As is the textbook method, thousands of people came out but their presence there was used beyond the authority of event organizers as a blank check, to put words in their mouth, or create new slogans for the event after its turn-out was reported.  
    Continue reading and watch the video HERE

    Editor In Chief Of World’s Best Known Medical Journal: Half Of All The Literature Is False

    Editor In Chief Of World’s Best Known Medical Journal: Half Of All The Literature Is False


    In the past few years more professionals have come forward to share a truth that, for many people, proves difficult to swallow. One such authority is Dr. Richard Horton, the current editor-in-chief of the Lancet – considered to be one of the most well respected peer-reviewed medical journals in the world.
    Dr. Horton recently published a statement declaring that a lot of published research is in fact unreliable at best, if not completely false.
    “The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness.” (source)
    This is quite distrubing, given the fact that all of these studies (which are industry sponsored) are used to develop drugs/vaccines to supposedly help people, train medical staff, educate medical students and more.
    It’s common for many to dismiss a lot of great work by experts and researchers at various institutions around the globe which isn’t “peer-reviewed” and doesn’t appear in a “credible” medical journal, but as we can see, “peer-reviewed” doesn’t really mean much anymore. “Credible” medical journals continue to lose their tenability in the eyes of experts and employees of the journals themselves, like Dr. Horton.

    Continue Reading HERE:

    What is medicine’s 5 sigma? 

    “A lot of what is published is incorrect.” I’m not allowed to say who made this remark because we were asked to observe Chatham House rules. We were also asked not to take photographs of slides. Those who worked for government agencies pleaded that their comments especially remain unquoted, since the forthcoming UK election meant they were living in “purdah”—a chilling state where severe restrictions on freedom of speech are placed on anyone on the government’s payroll. Why the paranoid concern for secrecy and non-attribution? Because this symposium—on the reproducibility and reliability of biomedical research, held at the Wellcome Trust in London last week—touched on one of the most sensitive issues in science today: the idea that something has gone fundamentally wrong with one of our greatest human creations. * The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientifi c literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Affl icted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny eff ects, invalid exploratory analyses, and fl agrant confl icts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness. As one participant put it, “poor methods get results”. The Academy of Medical Sciences, Medical Research Council, and Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council have now put their reputational weight behind an investigation into these questionable research practices. The apparent endemicity of bad research behaviour is alarming. In their quest for telling a compelling story, scientists too often sculpt data to fi t their preferred theory of the world. Or they retrofi t hypotheses to fi t their data. Journal editors deserve their fair share of criticism too. We aid and abet the worst behaviours. Our acquiescence to the impact factor fuels an unhealthy competition to win a place in a select few journals. Our love of “signifi cance” pollutes the literature with many a statistical fairy-tale. We reject important confi rmations. Journals are not the only miscreants. Universities are in a perpetual struggle for money and talent, endpoints that foster reductive metrics, such as high-impact publication. National assessment procedures, such as the Research Excellence Framework, incentivise bad practices. And individual scientists, including their most senior leaders, do little to alter a research culture that occasionally veers close to misconduct. * Can bad scientifi c practices be fi xed? Part of the problem is that no-one is incentivised to be right. Instead, scientists are incentivised to be productive and innovative. Would a Hippocratic Oath for science help? Certainly don’t add more layers of research redtape. Instead of changing incentives, perhaps one could remove incentives altogether. Or insist on replicability statements in grant applications and research papers. Or emphasise collaboration, not competition. Or insist on preregistration of protocols. Or reward better pre and post publication peer review. Or improve research training and mentorship. Or implement the recommendations from our Series on increasing research value, published last year. One of the most convincing proposals came from outside the biomedical community. Tony Weidberg is a Professor of Particle Physics at Oxford. Following several high-profi le errors, the particle physics community now invests great eff ort into intensive checking and rechecking of data prior to publication. By fi ltering results through independent working groups, physicists are encouraged to criticise. Good criticism is rewarded. The goal is a reliable result, and the incentives for scientists are aligned around this goal. Weidberg worried we set the bar for results in biomedicine far too low. In particle physics, signifi cance is set at 5 sigma—a p value of 3 × 10–7 or 1 in 3·5 million (if the result is not true, this is the probability that the data would have been as extreme as they are). The conclusion of the symposium was that something must be done. Indeed, all seemed to agree that it was within our power to do that something. But as to precisely what to do or how to do it, there were no fi rm answers. Those who have the power to act seem to think somebody else should act fi rst. And every positive action (eg, funding well-powered replications) has a counterargument (science will become less creative). The good news is that science is beginning to take some of its worst failings very seriously. The bad news is that nobody is ready to take the fi rst step to clean up the system.
    Richard Horton richard.h


    Garland Shooting Event Revised – Shining a Spotlight on FBI’s Role Before Attack

    Garland Shooting Event Revised – Shining a Spotlight on FBI’s Role Before Attack

    Shawn Helton
    21st Century Wire 

    According to official reports over the last week, key details concerning the shooting outside the Curtis Culwell Center in Garland, Texas – have suddenly changed
    This past May 3rd, it was reported that two gunmen opened fire outside of a cartoon ‘art’ exhibition and “free speech contest” featuring images of the Prophet Muhammad in Garland, Texas.

    Incredibly, government scribes have change their official story line this week, with investigators now saying that the two named suspects, Elton Simpson and Nadir Hamid Soofi were shot dead, but not by a single traffic officer as was originally stated by authorities, by by heavily armed SWAT Team officers.
    This latest change radically differs from what the Garland Police Department had originally released shortly after the incident occurred.

    The crime scene revision adds intrigue to the story surrounding the ‘unnamed officer’ initially believed to have shot both suspects, as he was confidently declared a “hero,” following the incident.

    Why would the Garland Police declare such a dramatically different description of the events, after displaying so much adulation for the unnamed officer and his apparent actions?

    Initially, Garland police spokesman Joe Harn had stated that the traffic officer who requested not to be identified, was at the event as part of a heavy security detail prior to the drawing contest, as described in this early NBC Dallas affiliate report:

    “Harn added that off-duty officers work events at the Culwell Center every weekend, but that organizers paid the department around $10,000 for additional security that included agents with the ATF and FBI, security officers from the school district, off-duty police officers as well as SWAT officers and the bomb squad.”
    We see a clearer picture emerging regarding Harn’s account of the heavy security presence and are offered a small window into the financial component related to the highly orchestrated exhibition as mentioned here at 21WIRE:

    Officer Harn then notified the media — “The evacuation of all businesses in the area – just in case.” Notice how teams organized an evacuation, and not “shelter in place” – more evidence that points to a drill.”

    ‘Secrets in Garland?’ – What really happened during the apparent 15 second incident at the Curtis Culwell Center in Garland, Texas. (Photo link

    Additionally, as we previously reported at 21WIRE shortly after the story first broke, the main suspect named in the incident, Elton Simpson, had been under the watchful eye of the FBI for nearly a decade and was in close contact with an undercover informant during that time. The following is an excerpt from that report, which also discloses that Simpson served 3 years probation after being arrested by the FBI 2010 and in 2011, he served only 15 days in jail for making a ‘false statement’ concerning an alleged attempt to join the international terror group al-Shabaab, loosely linked to a web of others indicted for the same thing:

    “Elton Simpson, was already under surveillance by the FBI and was even the subject of a terror investigation. More importantly, we can also confirm Simpson was being handled by an FBI informantCourt papers filed in Arizona name the FBI undercover informant as Mr. Daba Deng, a Kenyan and who, from 2007, was paid $132,000 by the FBI to “become friends with Mr. Simpson”, and who appears to have groomed Simpson through a local mosque, and helped to develop Simpson’s ideas about “jihad”.”

    The same report outlined the relationship Nadir Hamid Soofi, the apparent ‘second’ shooter had with Simpson and likely with authorities:

    “Elton Simpson’s roommate and that they both shared an apartment in Phoenix, Arizona, and also attended the same mosque – the Islamic Center of North Phoenix. Is it not safe to assume then, that FBI informant Deng also knew and was interacting with Soofi as well?”

    In a Reuters clip on YouTube below, Sharon Soofi, the apparent mother of Nadir tearfully describes how her son has never been violent. Strangely, she didn’t appear to know Nadir’s roommate Elton, even calling him by a different name…

    In 21WIRE’s initial report regarding the highly suspicious events in Garland, we once again see how media often ignites a politically charged narrative for the masses:

    “USA Today then inserted this familiar talking point to round-out the basic “Twitter” narrative: “Al-Qaeda and ISIS have shown a deft ability to use the Internet, particularly YouTube and social media, to spread their message and recruit followers around the globe.
    According to Garland’s Mayor, Douglas Athas, and other media reports, a ‘SWAT Team’ was put into place BEFORE the event because of “safety concerns”.”

    The Story in Garland Takes a U-turn
    The rearranging of information regarding Garland’s “ISIS” shooting incident were outlined by Garland Police Chief Mitch Bates on Monday, May 11th, stating that the FBI had not contacted his department in the hours before the shooting. Continuing, Bates denied having any prior warning about either of the suspected gunmen – a story which directly contradicts what FBI Director James B. Comey stated at a news conference last week.

    ‘The Watchful Eye’ – FBI director James B. Comey. (Photo link

    In a May 8th report appearing in the NY Times, we see the extent FBI had been actively monitoring Simpson prior to the apparent attack outside the small event in Garland:

    “The F.B.I., which investigated Mr. Simpson from 2006 to 2014, reopened its investigation in March when he began to post messages on Twitter about the Islamic State.”
    Additionally, the report continues by outlining the level at which the FBI was involved before the cartoon contest:

    “Law enforcement officials had recognized that the cartoon contest, staged by anti-Muslim activists in what they called a defense of free speech, might be a target for violence. The F.B.I. set up a command center nearby in Dallas and issued a number of intelligence bulletins about the possibility of trouble, Mr. Comey said.”

    “As early as April 23, Mr. Simpson had referred on Twitter to the planned cartoon contest. Mr. Comey declined to say whether agents had seen that post or what specifically had prompted the bureau to warn the Garland police 10 days later about Mr. Simpson.”
    According to another excerpt from the NY Times  piece from May 11th, the FBI insists it issued a warning prior to the event:

    “The F.B.I. director, James B. Comey, told reporters in Washington on Thursday that three hours before the attack, the F.B.I. sent a bulletin to the Garland police warning them that Mr. Simpson might show up at the event.”
    If the FBI had followed Simpson for sometime, as outlined above, it seems likely they would have known exactly where the suspected gunmen was – why then, would Garland police state on the record they did not receive a warning?

    Additionally, what are we to make of the FBI setting up a command center nearby Garland in Dallas?

    Watch this Reuters news clip featuring Mitch Bates of the Garland police discussing the new developments in the Garland shooting case. Decide for yourself if the latest claims in the Garland case create more uncertainty about what happened…

    The identities of the two suspects were not known to us until many hours after the shooting occurred.” – Garland Police Chief Mitch Bates

    While the mainstream media has noted the shift in the story between the Garland police force and that of the FBI as a somewhat insignificant detail, the reality is, there is now a glaring change in the official narrative and the case should be examined more closely for its authenticity.

    ‘Weird Scene’ – This is an aerial view of the car said to have been used by both suspected gunmen in Garland. All of this damage we’re told  – happened in just a matter of seconds. (Photo link
    Staged Terror?

    Shortly after the incident, many media outlets released a flurry of reports early on May 5th, stating that ISIS had claimed responsibility for the Garland attack via a radio broadcast on its Al Bayan radio stationa story which originated from SITE Intelligence Group.

    As we’ve noted numerous times here at 21WIRE, the intelligence monitoring group SITE, has ties to both the CIA and Israeli intelligence. The group has also raised ethical concerns over the years and according to the group’s founder, Rita Katz – they’ve managed to the release terror related material linked to ISIS prior to the group itself.

    The staged events in Copenhagen, Paris, and now Garland, repeat the same script, all had intelligence linked gunmen who are also apparent extremists.

    And when you consider SITE’s involvement in the Garland story line, linked with that of anti-Islamic media personality Pamela Geller, who is the president of  the well-funded organization, the American Freedom Defense Initiative, the organizer of Garland’s Mohammed cartoon event, a polarizing political narrative emerges.

    Continue reading HERE:

    Tuesday, 19 May 2015

    One People's Roundtable Discussion: Lisa and D's Review of Wonderland

    Tonight on the One Peoples Roundtable Discussion Lisa and I will be going it alone, lol.  We've decided that perhaps we need to do a Review of sorts, to go over all of the incredible information that has been discussed on the Roundtable over the past 6 weeks.

    So tonight, Lisa and I will have a laid back chat to delve into all of the new insights, and strange rabbit holes we've seemingly fallen into lately, like Alice tumbling into the parallel universe of Wonderland.   We are going to open the chat for everyone to join us, to ask questions and give their thoughts and opinions and theories of this amazing journey we've been on.

    Please join us tonight on The One People's Roundtable Discussion, at 11pm BDT/ 6pm EDT, on CCN LIVE Stream:

    Or you can catch the show live here on RTS- just over on the Right hand margin.

    To join us in the chat room, please go to Lisa's website, where you can also watch the live stream:

    Next week, Brian should be back in the land of internet and joining us in the deep end of Wonderland!!

    See you all tonight!!

    Love d

    Saturday, 16 May 2015

    Computer Controlled Trains, and let's review those numbers, shall we?

    Further to the article I put out yesterday:  

    Jim Stone has put together a few more pieces of this puzzle- Article below.   Computer controlled trains?  



    You mean, kinda like Remotely Controlled Airplanes?!

    hmmmmmmm.....  Well that put's this following article into perspective a bit more, doesn't it?

    Officials: Amtrak train sped up before derailing

    By Jesse Byrnes - 05/14/15 07:03 PM EDT
    The Amtrak train involved in this week's deadly derailment sped up for about a minute before leaving the tracks near Pennsylvania, a member of the National Transportation Safety Board saidThursday evening.
    Robert Sumwalt said footage from a camera mounted near the front of the train showed it had sped up from 70 miles per hour to more than 100 miles per hour before derailing at a curve.

    The train was in a 50 mph section, The Associated Press notes, and Sumwalt said conductors have a timetable and should know the speed limits of particular sections of track.
    Investigators plan to interview engineer Brandon Bostian, who also suffered injuries, in the next few days. He is allowed to bring along another individual, Sumwalt said, presumably his lawyer.

    "We very much look forward to the opportunity to interview him," Sumwalt said of the engineer.

    Bostian's lawyer, Robert Goggin, said earlier in the day Thursday that the man behind the controls had "no recollection" of the crash that left at least eight dead and injured more than 200.

    But then there is also this piece of news that the US media seems to not really reporting on:

    FBI investigates report that projectile hit windshield of Amtrak train moments before it crashed... as it's revealed TWO other trains were also struck minutes apart on the same corridor

    • -Conductor on derailed train said she overheard Amtrak Train 188 engineer Brandon Bostian report on the radio that his train was hit in the windshield
    • -Moments later, at 9.21pm on Tuesday, the train derailed killing eight
    • -At 9.05pm Tuesday, a different Amtrack train reported being struck in a window by an unknown object
    • -At 9.10pm Tuesday, a northbound SEPTA regional rail train reported it had been 'hit by a rock or shot at' in the windshield
    • -All three incidents happened within a few miles of 30th Street Station along the same stretch of track outside Philadelphia
    • -FBI investigating damage to the 'left hand lower portion' of the windshield on the derailed Amtrak Train 188
    • -Officials say there is no evidence the three incidents are connected - or that they had anything to do with the derailment  

    The FBI is investigating a report that the Amtrak train that crashed in Philadelphia on Tuesday night could have been 'shot at' moments before it derailed, killing eight and injuring 200.The new claim on Friday comes as investigators revealed that two other trains had suffered cracked windows after being hit by unknown objects just minutes before the deadly crash and only a few miles apart. An assistant conductor on Amtrak Train 188 has told National Transportation Safety Board investigators she heard Amtrak engineer Brandon Bostain say that his train had been hit by something. Seconds later, the train careened off the tracks.Photos of the derailed train show a small, focused crack on the lower left part of the windshield - though it's unknown whether the damage occurred before or after the crash.
    Scroll down for video 
    Crack: The FBI is investigating what could have caused the small, focused crack (pictured lower right) on the windshield of the derailed Amtrak train
    Crack: The FBI is investigating what could have caused the small, focused crack (pictured lower right) on the windshield of the derailed Amtrak train
    Bostian's comment was in response to a report from a SEPTA regional rail engineer, who radioed in to say his train had been 'hit by a rock or shot at' in the area about 9.10pm Tuesday. The projectile shattered the windshield of the northbound SEPTA train.Five minutes earlier, a projectile cracked a window of a different Amtrak train - a southbound Acela Express - about 9.05pm.Train 188, which was headed north from Philadelphia to New York, derailed at 9.21pm. All of the reported hits came within just a few miles of Philadelphia's 30th Street Station. SEPTA, Southeast Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, said there's no indication the object that hit the commuter rail train is related to the Amtrak derailment.

    Read more: 

    Oh noooooooo..... the incidents have NOTHING in common, and I'm sure they're not related in any way at all.    No really!

    And finally, I would like to point everyone's attention to the wikipedia listing of train accidents for 2015 so far.... please note my highlights....


    Now, before anyone says anything about how busy the US rail system is, or how many trains run through the US daily.....  I have traveled extensively through Asia and Europe, and I can tell you that North America ain't got nothin on India or Europe.  Just to give a quick example:

    - India 
    runs 12,617 passenger trains and 7421 freight trains daily.

    And yet...... look at the number of US Train crashes compared to the number of train crashes in India? And look at Canada.  Do you really think that India's Railway lines are in better condition than the US'?  Not to mention the ages of the trains?  The Amtrak train that crashed outside of Philadelphia was less than a year old.....  

    India Crashes:  2 
    Canada Crashes:  4
    America Crashes:  11 

    Yea...... I don't think so.  

    And the people who died "on the train" .....  remember this:  

    3 JP Morgan Bankers, a Pharmaceutical Scientist, and an Art Curator Walk onto a Train....

    .... Just sayin'.



    FACT 1: The section of track the train crashed on was a speed restricted section, which means the computer takes over during that section and won't let the conductor go faster than the set limit (in this case 50 mph) even if he wants to. CONCLUSION: The conductor did not cause this

    FACT 2: The conductor unexpectedly survived, and said the speed readouts on the train showed 50 mph up until he blacked out. Yet investigators have proven the train was doing 107 mph when it crashed. CONCLUSION: Something was amiss in the electronic controls that provide the readouts.

    FACT 3: Survivors on the train said it was riding as smooth as glass up until the crash. CONCLUSION: The tracks were in excellent condition, SO GOOD that they did not have enough bumps and shakes to let anyone know the train was way over speed. This would have hid an impending crash reality from the conductor.

    FACT 4: The crash happened at night, which also would have concealed the speed of the train from the conductor. CONCLUSION: He probably just looked at the readouts and believed them, not realizing anything was amiss at all until he woke up after blacking out. At 107 mph, he probably bounced off the interior of the engine and blacked out less than a quarter of a second after the train left the tracks, far too short of a time to realize anything happened at all.

    FACT 5: The engine was brand spanking new, far less than a year old. CONCLUSION: It had all the nice new modern perfectly programmed to allow hacking computerized controls on it, and ADDITIONALLY, was new enough so the conductor may not have been fully acquainted with every last sound the motors made, and on top of that, the motors were probably extremely quiet which would also conceal the fact that the train was going way too fast.

    FACT 6, AND HERE IS THE CLINCHER THAT PROVES IT WAS STUXNET OR A STUXNET VARIANT: The control readouts all indicated a low speed at a time when the train was doing over 100. What industrial virus keeps control readouts normal while it destroys a facility and everything goes kablooey?

    ANSWER: STUXNET, and ONLY STUXNET. This is how Israel wrecked many of Iran's nuclear centrifuges, Stuxnet spun them too fast all the while the readouts said the speed was normal, JUST LIKE THIS TRAIN, there is no difference between a centrifuge motor speed readout and a speedometer, the zio clan is totally hosed with this one, THEY CRASHED THIS TRAIN AND THERE IS NO WAY OUT OF IT. Now the big question is,Since this train operates in America's main political corridor, WHO was on that train the zio clan wanted killed? Stuxnet Amtrak crash in Philadelphia involving train heavily used by politicians Am Amtrak train went off the tracks while going 106 miles an hour in the immediate approach to a 50 mph curve. Early reports said there was a huge explosion before derailment but I do not know what to make of them because people on the train have not said anything about an explosion. It looks like a scrap yard, not a train wreck and only 6 people died? YEAH RIGHT!

    This was probably caused by a zio clan hack The trains are computer controlled with the conductor in a supervisory position, and that leaves serious room for questioning how one hit a 50 mph curve at 106 mph when it should have slowed down for it automatically, AND this happened right after it left a station, which means if there was a curve that close it should not have sped up at all. The whitewash is on now, And guess what? Another computer controlled subway train in Mexico City came into a station yesterday and rear ended another train at full speed. They explained it away as communication glitches and wet tracks but what a coincidence! The subway trains were amazingly shredded (like I never thought that could ever happen) and I suspected the zio clan played a game even before this latest Amtrak crash. The Amtrak crash happened so soon after the train left the station that tickets had not been collected yet.
    One man said "We were rolling along nice and smooth and then all of a sudden we were on our side" Which is exactly what would happen if all the train did was accelerate to a point of doom. Try a 50 mph turn at 106. If you are asleep in the back seat (the perspective of all passengers) you will be going along nice and smooth and just "suddenly" (fill in the blank) There are other reports, such as it wobbled and went off the tracks, the brakes were hit and it went off the tracks, but this is what would be felt in the back of the train as the front flew off the tracks. Most likely the man who said it was all smooth and then the car was on its side was probably near the front. 106 is not fast for this particular train, which travels at up to 150 mph. The problem was that it hit a 50 mph curve at 106. If this was not a threat and was instead an actual assassination attempt, it seems it probably failed. One car got the brunt of the action and was mangled beyond belief but 5 were in fairly good condition afterwards.
    Not bad for 106 mph. It could have been worse. I am going to stick with the original statements because we all know what happens with the white wash. BUT I WILL SAY THIS: Think back to the time frame prior to 6 or 7 years ago. Most of the the bad train accidents happened 100 years ago, then going into the 1960's they were practically unheard of. By the time we got to the 1990's it all became so safe that problems such as trains on the wrong track and trains going the wrong speed were nonexistent, it never happened because UN HACKED computers controlled it all. Why now, after the illustrious Stuxnet was invented have we returned to a train accident frequency similar to what happened in the 1800's? GOOD QUESTION.  

    See updates at: